Date of Submission:
The Ferguson case where Michael Brown, an 18-year-old African American was fatally shot dead by Darren Wilson, a white police officer, automatically prompts a discussion about violation of human rights in the United States and beyond. The circumstance of the killing of the Michael is enough to raise many questions in regard to the law enforcement in relation to African Americans. To give more emphasis on this incidence, it is important to note that immediately after the killing of Michael, there was protesting and civil unrest that had the implication that the killing was unfair and against the United States laws, and moreover against human rights (Curry and Ghebremedhin 6).
As was stated earlier, the killing of Michael is debatable in relation to violation of human rights. Just few days after the shooting, Ferguson Police Department released a video that clearly outlined the events that resulted to the killing of Michael. However, the video showed Michael taking some cigarillos and pushing a store employee who dared to prevent him from leaving after the act, it is reasonable to rule out that it was unfair to shoot him. Michael was not harmed and the video shows it very clearly. Afterwards, the video received various criticisms from both family members and the public. So, the criticisms and the demonstrations held after the incidence is a clear implication that this was a clear indicative of human rights problems that the United States faces as a nation. In addition to the fact that the video showed that Michael was not harmed, the video shows that there was instance that Michael raised his hands as a symbol of cooperation with the police officer (Curry and Ghebremedhin 7). So, if Michael was ready to cooperate with the police officer, then shooting him was totally against the law and morality.
Various commentaries from different stakeholders review that there is a strong relationship between the incidence and the violation of human rights. St. Louis County prosecuting attorney Robert P. McCulloch admits that the incidence that resulted in the killing of Michael was not an ordinary case. Therefore, according to him, the incidence would attract a grand jury that is considered as a major tool for indictment. However, Robert rehearsed with a panel of twelve judges where nine were whites and three were black so that he may gather enough evidence to launch the grand jury against Wilson, but he later said that the jury had found no probable cause that would bring Wilson to trial on criminal charges. On the other hand, the United States president, Barrack Obama, called for peace and calm in relation to this incidence. Obama remained in a neutral platform in that he said that there was no excuse for violence against police and in addition that there was no excuse for excessive use of force against peaceful demonstrations for lawfully exercising such demonstration (Curry and Ghebremedhin 10). In similar instances, Obama has been noted to condemn the act of racial discrimination. For example, in the case of a teenager who was shot in 2012, he gave out a speech that reflected on racial discrimination though he seemed to dodge by the issue.
Killing of Michael by Wilson is an indicative of violation of human rights, especially due to the fact that Michael was unharmed and raised his hands as a symbol he was ready to cooperate with the police officer. However, the incidence has varied implications to different stakeholders. Some think that failure to prosecute Wilson was not fair, and others think that there was no probable cause to charge Wilson on the basis of murder.
Curry Colleen and Ghebremedhin Sabina. Michael Brown Could Have Survived First 5 Shots, Last Shot Killed Him, Autopsy Says. ABC News. 23(2), 03-12. Retrieved November 26, 2014.
Get a free quote!
When it comes to paper ordering - get a free quote - make sure that we are able to complete your assignment!Evaluate